|
Nick
Roddick, Moving Pictures veteran interviewer, will be interviewing
the well-known and the budding new talent, as well as the
other key players at this 50th Berlinale edition.
The
multi award-winning Tuvalu, one of the buzz films
of the Berlinale, was 10 years in the
making, but its director never had any doubt that
it would be worth the effort.
If
you haven't seen the poster, you must have
been walking around with your eyes down. It's
everywhere, including the places where you
thought they couldn't put posters. There's
even, so I'm told, one in the ladies' loo
of the Moving Pictures office.
Drive
east on the Leipziger Strasse at night and
the name is projected, eight stories high,
on the side of the Bulgarian Cultural Institute.
It's hard to escape Tuvalu.
And once Veit Helmer, its director, has locked
on to you, it's not easy to escape him, either.
Having
spent 10 years of his life thinking about,
writing, trying to raise the money for and
casting his film, Helmer has since
the international premiere in San Sebastián
last September been devoting his not
inconsiderable energy to promoting it.
Tuvalu
screens here in the New German Films sidebar.
It was, claims Helmer, promised a Panorama
slot last summer, provided he didn't show
it at any other festival first but
he did, so he didn't get it. It's a film that
divides people, but no one can deny that it
is strange, surreally beautiful and quite
sure of its world view.
Somewhat
less prepossessing, but equally sure of his
world view, Helmer reels off Tuvalu's
festival career. "The film was premiered in
San Sebastián," he says. "It won a
FIPRESCI award in Ghent
and an audience award in Kiev. It's been to
London, Chicago... I guess around 20 festivals,
and we got 12 awards. It won the Kodak Vision
Award in Slamdance.
"It's
strange to say, but I wouldn't have had this
buzz here [every screening has been packed]
if the film hadn't been shown at the other
festivals. To be honest, I was really disappointed
at not being selected for Venice. But now,
looking back, maybe it was better for the
film: it's better to build up than to fall
down."
I
first encountered Helmer when he called me
back in November, trying to book advertising
for the film in the Film Market Catalogue
or rather, to talk a discount which
he could then take to the sales agent, Bavaria.
My
next sighting was in Rotterdam where, resplendent
in a new suit, he had a party thrown in
his honour by the Goethe Institut. Finally,
he turns up in the Moving Pictures office
and button-holes me about the film.
"The
idea came when I was swimming in an indoor
pool in Hamburg," he recalls. "I said, 'This
is the perfect location for a feature film'.
It was a very mystical place, with hallways
and staircases. But I had to do a couple
of short films before I met my writer, Michaela
Beck."
The
shorts were universally well-received, but
they didn't immediately open doors. "It
was a long journey," he says. "After my
shorts, all the distributors said, 'Buddy,
we will make our first feature together'.
But it was a major which actually put up
the money: sometimes, answers come from
the direction you would least expect. Christoff
Ott from Buena Vista [Germany]
gave me a minimum guarantee. That convinced
Filmboard Berlin Brandenburg to give me
money, and I got some money from the commissioning
editor at Sudwest Rundfunk. But it's a very
small budget $900,000 and
I got lots of support from my actors."
The
casting, too, wasn't like other films. Tuvalu
is made in an invented language, which meant
Helmer didn't have to worry about whether
his actors spoke German, English or whatever.
"Our
dogma," he says, "is to use dialogue only
if it can be understood in every country of
the world. The film, as it is shown in Berlin,
can also be shown in China and South America
and anywhere else without subtitling or dubbing."
By
his own reckoning, Helmer saw 1,100 people
in 12 countries before finally casting French
actor Denis Lavant (Les Amants Du Pont-Neuf)
and Tadjikistan's Chulpan Hamatova
(Luna Papa) in the lead roles. The
film was shot in Sofia because, claims Helmer,
it was the only place he could find a swimming
pool sufficiently dilapidated yet still capable
of holding water. But Bulgaria turned out
to have other advantages.
"Film
is disappearing," he says, "so we tried
to work with the old techniques matte
painting, for instance. My art director,
Alexander Manasse, put glass in front of
the camera and painted out all the buildings
we didn't want to show.
"There
were no computers used for making the film.
We had a camera which was new in the twenties.
We had arc lights which had to be switched
off every 20 minutes to load them with carbon.
And we couldn't find an anamorphic lens
for the underwater scene, so I had to shoot
it with a normal one."
The
plan was to convert the image to anamorphic.
But then, when it showed up on the editing
table with the normal image viewed through
an anamorphic lens, Helmer liked the result
so much he left it. "As the camera is always
turning around, it's a very surreal effect
which nobody can understand how we got,"
he says.
For
his next film, Helmer will be aiming for
something less universal in terms of language.
He is working with regular Paskaljevic and
Kusturica collaborator Gordan Mihic. "He
already wrote the most funny dialogue,"
he says. "But I don't think I ever want
to use dialogue as a main tool to tell narration.
I think I like to tell stories with images
first, and give the dialogue another function."
*
Footnote: in the time it has taken
me to write this, Veit Helmer has called twice
to see when his profile was going to run.
Here it is Veit. Keep on trucking.
|